Steve Bradley vs. Andy McKean. The choice should be clear. Yes, Steve is new to politics, but he has been in business for a number of years. Steve understands the plight of small business people, and the risks they take.

Andy was a Republican. Why did he change? Not clear on that, although his record shows he often votes like a Democrat. When he left the Republican Party, he had taken over $100,000 from them. Was that the right and ethical thing to do?

Andy has accepted substantial funds from the east coast, who is also funding Ms. Finkenauer. It’s been reported he has accepted funds from folks on the west coast as well. Why does he need or want their money? Hum, he must be promising some future legislation they want.

Why should a candidate accept funds from out of our state? Steve, if elected will propose legislation prohibiting campaign contribution from out of our state, he will also support term limits. Steve is an active outdoorsman. He will vote to retain the REAP program. That is why I am voting for Steve Bradley.

James Conlin


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.